Showing posts with label opinion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label opinion. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The death of Former President Mandela and the subliminal looming election banner “Vote ANC, Do it For Mandela”


My Opinion:
Sumayya Omar,
Head of Politics, South Africa and International Affairs
10- 12- 2013

The death of Former President Mandela and the subliminal looming election banner “Vote ANC, Do it For Mandela”

“Death is something inevitable. When a man has done what he considers to be his duty to his people and his country, he can rest in peace. I believe I have made that effort and that is, therefore, why i sleep for the eternity”- Nelson Mandela 

His magically slow, husky and rather entertaining voice which we all try to impersonate will be echoed in eternity. Mabiba shirts will become a worldwide trend, the Madiba dance (of the slow arm movements) will become part of South African Youth moves. History books in the world will be rewritten but most importantly generations will be born and reborn, inebriated with the spirit of Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela.

When mourning the death of former president Nelson Mandela, do not mourn only for his death. Realise through Mandela’s death the other unspoken and forgotten leaders, realise that Mandela was amongst those great leaders who awoke their people for the call of the forward march against white domination. Friends all, mourn the fact that he was the last cadre of his generational leadership who stood in the forefront, regardless of the concrete walls and chains that surrounded him for 27 years. His death signals a closure for those colossal generational leaders and leadership of his time who actively fought against the apartheid regime. 

I have attended many protests in South Africa and especially in Gauteng where majority of the chants of the struggle that are sung at these various protest are hardly ever about Nelson Mandela. After many protest (chants) about Oliver Tambo, Chris Hani, Steve Biko, capitalism, socialism, I had addressed a comrade and questioned why masses hardly sing about Tata. She replied and said that whilst he was the leader of the struggle, he was imprisoned and away. Thus actively on the ground it was leaders like Oliver Tambo, Steve Biko, and Walter Sisulu etc. who continuously joined the ranks of the struggle and fought amongst the masses against the system. Those were the leaders who not only visited and resided in the Bantustans where the system had repressed them but these leaders had addressed the masses and continuously restored hope.

This is why there are more songs sung about them rather than Mandela - but the masses never lost hope in Mandela as they knew that whilst Winnie was leading a militant struggle he would eventually bring freedom, justice and equality.

Tata Mandela is their saviour and hero. A  man who unapologetically, through a negotiated process, had created and led for a condition that would be a South Africa, for the people of South Africa. It was often his ability to listen to the apartheid government with simplistic demand that the way forward, would be a peaceful, democratic and cohesive transition; which crushed the buffer zones and barriers between the reality of the blacks, the reality of whites and the reality of the world on South Africa.  It was his functional words and actions that made us humans realise that you and I, black man and white man can live together.

Apartheid has made us conscious about our physical appearance and colour but for all of us we cannot deny that we have come into a warm and embracing South Africa regardless of our social ills. People expected many things after apartheid, the expectation of eradication of inequality of class, race, and gender. Worryingly somehow South Africa is experiencing a deficit in ‘unity of leadership and purpose’. For one, we cannot say that we don’t inculcate unity of leadership and purpose because we are still a learning infant democracy.

Today is the fourth day of the 10 days mourning period of Comrade Nelson Mandela as well as the official mourning day. Our comrades are on the streets mourning the death of Nelson Mandela, reminiscing the days Madiba stood up on those same streets advocating for freedom, justice and equality. There are others who have written articles and made statements about his death; in doing so highlighting his symbolic meaning, creating the perfect picture and colouring the faultless description of Mandela by the tributes and actions they are paying to him.

In my view, what more can be said about Nelson Mandela? No man, no country, nor any statesmen can tell you about your leader. We have all met Mandela, because we are living in a country that he has fought for and perceived through his eyes the dreams and vision of South Africa that is in peace with itself. No individualistic view about Tata is more important than yours because we have all subjectively experienced and related to Tata to our own selves! But collectively those views are ample enough to write a biography of Mandela by all peoples of the world who have been touched by him, which is to be archived in all libraries of the world- serving as the engine for his legacy to be echoed in eternity.

In 1993 the world and South Africa bided farewell to two great men of the struggle. The first being a man which Nelson Mandela referred to as one of the greatest ‘giants’ who walked the globe, a globe inherited with hatred that is learned from both World Wars and the Cold War and continuation of minority rule over a majority people, regardless of entering a new era of human security. That year we said: “Hamba Kahle People’s Leader” in which Nelson Mandela delivered a speech at Comrade Oliver Reginald Tambo’s (1917-1993) funeral. Mandela said: “We say he has departed. But can we allow him to depart while we live!”  So peoples of the world, I ask you , can we allow Tata to depart the soil of this earth as well as the heart of ourselves until the ideals of a peaceful, just, transparent and equal South Africa, Africa, Palestine and the World is realised?

The other great man of the struggle, the revolutionary and internationalist commander, who was assassinated in 1993, was comrade Chris Hani. At his funeral Mandela said:” The struggle is far from over. You are our soldiers of peace, our army for the elections that will transform this country. Go back to your homes, your regions, and organise as never before. Together, we are invincible. That is how we will pay the greatest tribute we can to Chris Hani freedom in South Africa. Let Chris Hani live on through all of us”.  Thus being dubbed by Mandela as the armies of South Africa with a transformative nature and it being less than five months until the 5th General Elections; have we transformed South Africa along the lines of ‘development as freedom’, not only employing our political freedoms or ensuring political equality of the notion ‘one man, one vote’ but rather as armies have we strived towards socioeconomic freedoms? Championing the issues of the working class movement and fighting for development of the underdeveloped?

In 2003 again the world and South Africa bided farewell to one of the dedicated anti-apartheid leaders, comrade Walter Sisulu. At Walter Sisulu’s funeral, Nelson Mandela described him as the “spear of the nation”. He said: “The spear of the nation has fallen... let us pick up the spear, to build a country after the example that Walter Sisulu has set for us.” This year Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe delivered a memorial lecture on the life of Walter Sisulu at the University of South Africa, in May. He highlighted the strides of Walter Sisulu in advocating for education throughout the struggle speared through the platform of the South African Student Congress. Comrade Motlanthe said:” He knew that education was not only the means to rise in the world but one of the most potent weapons in the struggle for equality”. So peoples of the world, I ask you, how much have we dedicated to educate the poor, marginalised and under-privileged to create an equal society? We cannot bid farewell to Walter Sisulu because we are far from reaching equilibrium in education for all. 

10 years later, on the 05 of December 2013, we have begun to bid farewell to a Nelson Mandela.  A man who openly criticised and condemned presidents for their employment of violence to bring a peaceful solution, yet these statesmen will be attending his Funeral i.e. Former President George Bush.

Whilst leadership cannot be concretely defined as containing specific traits, values and skills, good leadership is dependent on the social, political and economic context of the time and goals of a collective rather than the leader himself. For Mandela it was realising the pleading of his people as a leader (before and during imprisonment) through his comprehensive speech and patience, the ideal of a South Africa for all as a non-racist and non-sexist society and the goal to destroy the apartheid regime.

Nevertheless South Africa is alive as a rainbow nation because Mandela along with the generational leaders and founders of the ANCYL had surrendered and dedicated their life to human solidarity, reconciliation and truth. We are alive because it was comrade Mandela who had not incited revenge on the white people of South Africa – he preached that we should hate the system rather than hating on colour.

So in 2013, a year before we collectively reach 20 years of democracy – the body of Nelson Mandela has died but his legacy and spirit lives on. I, for one, am concerned about our President Jacob Zuma’s speech at his Funeral. President Zuma (being only the second president after Nelson Mandela) under his leadership in a democratic has had the highest corruption levels, controversies i.e. State information Bill/ E-toll law and is slowly ensuring a decline in public confidence in the ANC.

In addition, bringing in an awkward twist to the solemn mood, we question already if he would have the audacity during the run up of the next election to deploy the idea that his cadres should encourage voters to vote for the ANC under the banner” Vote ANC, Do it for Mandela”.

Frantz Fanon concludes the leadership of today: “During the struggle for liberation the leader awakened the people and promised them a forward march, heroic and unmitigated. Today, he uses every means to put them to sleep, and three or four times a year asks them to remember the colonial period and to look back on the long way they have come since then”

It would suffice to say that Nelson Mandela’s life was led for us to learn from, he led by an example. In 1999 he didn’t run for a second term in office, this is an example for African leaders that tyranny cannot be bestowed upon the country and her countrymen after the struggle of independence has been accomplished.  

South Africans once again will need time to reconcile, face the truth and justly mourn their Former President’s Death. Being servants to the cause of justice, freedom and equality- we have a duty to realise that if we cannot learn from Mandela, or respect the past then how will we be able to build a South Africa which our historic leaders have fought for?

We cannot create another Mandela but what we can do is draw from his strengths and critically identify his weaknesses to create “transformative leadership” that will eventually ensure, for example, unity of purpose. We must acknowledge the turning point and the greatest teaching of Mandela is that he brought blacks and whites on the same foothold.  For the ANC, Nelson Mandela’s death should be the reason for introspection and a catharsis. It should serve as a subliminal message that democracy and the South Africa that Mandela envisioned is slipping under their personality based leadership and internal political feuds.
OPINION PIECE BY Sumayya Omar : MSA UNION Head of Politics, South African & International Affairs

Thursday, May 2, 2013

A Different Perspective On Syria


Sumayya Omar, Political officer of the Union of Muslim Students South Africa

Do you know the history of Middle East? In essence it is the graveyard for all superpowers. Bring war and bloodshed upon my people and we will strike back with unity. Bring destruction upon our lands and we will show you conquest and liberation.  Out of every strike you make on us Muslims, a new jihadist movement is borne.

Israeli media reported that the ‘New Arab Rising’ and a new call for Arab leadership is one of an “Islamic, Anti-Western, Anti- liberal, Anti- Israeli, Anti- democratic wave”.  As Muslims, we know it as the call for Shariah law, but have we ever questioned why the call for Shariah is more apparent in the last 20 years?
 As Muslims, have we failed to link the deaths of our Muslim dictators? Starting with the execution of Saddam in 2006, and then with Ben Ali who suffered from a stroke in 2010, Qaddaffi’s death in 2012, Mubarak’s cancer outbreak in 2012. . . And now Syria is on the brink of the same fate.
Firstly, these leaders were Muslims by birth, but were their belief in only One God customary? Was Allah their only God or were they, their own Gods in the lands in which they ruled? Was the Quran their constitution or did they abandon the Quran and create a new book- Qaddaffi’s Green book? Was Shariah their law or did they massacre the people who lived according to Shariah?
Regardless of their dictatorship we need to understand their rule of law, their underlying beliefs of politics and we need to become wary of their devotees.
In this article, I have no intention to link the Syrian Revolution; to what the media brands it as a call to dictatorship or even a revolution that is fuelled by the west to oust Assad. My intention rather is educate you on bathism and why there is a worldwide Muslim call to support the Free Syrian Army.

These Baathist leaders namely: Saddam Hussein and Bashar Al Assad who are rather a unique kind. The Syrian Army whose slogan is: “  Ask my son, ask my father, ask my grandfather, ask my in-laws , Ask Al- Wahid Al-Ahad (Allah), ask whomever you wish, Bathism is my religion and my Lord is Bashar Al- Assad” have made it clear to us that Bathism for the Syrian devotees of Bashar is a religion, a sort of Islamic sect. Yet in actuality it is an Arab political party that was created in Iraq and Syria. Their ideological commitment was of Secularisation, Socialism and Pan-Arab Unionism in both Syrian and Iraq. For Syria it became a legal Syrian political party after 1963. Sources say after 2000 when Bashar Al- Assad took over his father’s reign, Bathism had ended. Yet we can beg to differ, due to his army’s slogan for example.
Syria is headed By Bashar Al – Assad and the Assad’s have ruled for over 40 years. Bashar’s regime compromises of Nusaiyra/ Alwais.  Their God is Bashar and they believe in the trinity of Allah; that Allah is reincarnated in Muhammad (S.A.W), then that Allah is reincarnated in Ali (RA), whom they take as a holy spirit, and thereafter Allah is reincarnated into Salman. They are not followers of the Quran or the Sunnat of the Prophet (S.A.W), they denounce Syrians to pray Salaah and grow a beard.  Whatever comes in their way of believing and praising Bashar, they will slaughter; they state that “whoever pushes Syria in a corner, we will push Allah, the one created him, into a corner”. They have openly waged war on Masajids, scholars of Islam and Islamic text.

What has started as an uprising two years ago, has now spilled over into civil war. Over 70 000 people have been killed and 1.2 million people are refugees in foreign lands. The Free Syrian Army is branded as rebel and terrorist groups. The Arab World is failing to help the people of Syria. Russia and China realistically are the role players in the supposed peace talks. The most significant action perhaps of the Arab league was that they granted the Syrian Opposition a summit seat. Turkey is evidently denying the claims made against them for the deportation and expulsion of Syrian Refugees in Turkey (A UN violation indeed!). Again we can question actions of the Turks - who’s side are they on? Evidently the west has not only merged Turkey but Turkey is now the gateway to Europe. Furthermore Turkey has reconciled with Israel, precisely defining that the apology process was done through the White House and Obama, and that reconciliation isn’t linked to the Syrian war. 
But the persecution of our brothers and sisters can’t go on for any longer; the civil war needs to end. It cannot be ended by the west, for their interest is only annihilate Bashar ( though putting the blame on islamist) and dominate the Arab World.  It is no longer the actual “cry” for freedom but rather, the blood that has being shed is the call for freedom.
On the 7th of February 2012 a Fatwa was signed by 108 Muslim scholars worldwide to encourage Muslims to support the FREE SYRIAN ARMY. This is one of the calls amongst the calls of unity, which the west has “denounced” it as the ‘Arab rising”, it is the same call that was recited 20 years ago in Palestine; it is the call for Jihad.

The Solution is not diplomacy it is Jihad.  Once again the Syrians have stated: “Renounce Al-Assad or else Syria will become your graveyard”. For the faith of Syria and the war is not to be determined by the west, it should be by us Muslims and Muslim Countries. For it is a war to instil Shariah and not the Democracy of which is the west speaks about or outlined in USA Foreign Policy. For he Who controls political language essentially controls political action.


Friday, February 1, 2013

Opinion : Military intervention for Economic Domination

By : Sumayya Omar

 
Ever wondered why our continent is being bombarded by "Western Powers" declaring to fight against the so-called rebel groups and ensuring the construction of democratic rule? Have you ever come across the quote “Resistance is not terrorism"? Did politics ever reveal it to you; that all politics is a crime, a crime with no cost to the West but suffrage to the rest? 

We read it everywhere and witness it on the news. We see that France has re-instated its former colonial position in Mali, realigning their power and assisting the Malian Government to fight against the Tauregs (commonly known as the rebel groups) who are nomads of the land and who now seek refuge in the far Mountains of Mali. Islam is their religion, and so, they are called "Islamist" or "Jihadist" by the West.
 
We watched on Sunday as Malian troops with French backing invaded Northern Timbuktu, secured the airport of Timbuktu from the ‘rebels’, and recaptured northern Timbuktu. Nevertheless it is rumored that historical artifacts, manuscripts and lost libraries of Islamic History were destroyed by “Islamist extremists" with statements that extremists burnt manuscripts and texts of ancient religions. One would question why the media would phrase it as such or even report on such fallacy, but in reality and not Western reality, those claims are false. Mahmoud Zouber who is Mali's presidential aide on Islamic Affairs, stated that the manuscripts are safe and have not been destroyed. In actuality, only shrines and monuments faced destruction.

 The Malian situation has very little to do with Islamic history but rather, as mentioned in the beginning, "All politics is a crime", and thus all politics is about protecting and advancing the Western interest. Furthermore, when did resistance begin to be equated to terrorism? 

For years now the Malian Government has been failing to provide security and territorial stability for its people with failed rebel attempts to overthrow the government from as early as the 1960s. This has been met with heightened population tension from the Tauregs and Malians which is a result of conflict in religion and the enforcing of Shariah (Islamic Law) by the Tauregs who have dominated Mali for some time. Furthermore, it is because of the threat of desertification as well the unsustainable use of its resources owing to the challenges which the West African country faces.  

Mali is a West African country, with a mixed population of desert people, French and Tauregs. Just south of Algeria and Mali lies Niger, a country that is currently is the fourth largest producer of Uranium and co-incidentally supplying the French nuclear power stations. Not only is Uranium on the Malian doorstep but the Sahel Oil reserves as well.   

Moreover, Mali has been branded as the so-called 'training ground for Al-Qaeda" and a country which is alleged to be an abode of Islamic terrorists, which prompts powers, such as the United States of America, to back any power in Mali in order to ensure that Al Qaeda doesn’t set up any training ground.  

For some time Mali has encountered and experienced territorial instability between the secular state and Islamist movement or the "Jihadist." For example, since April last year rebel groups have been claiming to invade and capture the city of Bamako which home most French citizens.
 
But what really sparked the situation in Mali links back to the occurrence of the hostage crisis at the In Amenas gas plant that was directly linked to an Al-Qaeda operation. As openly stated by Mokthar Belmokhtar, who had fought in both Afghanistan in 1980 and the Algerian civil war in the 1990s, “We are ready to negotiate with the West and the Algerian government provided they stop their bombing of Mali's Muslims."
 
Questionable now is how ironic that the French has responded to the Malian government's call for aid and military assistance but not to the Central African Republic's calls?
 
In the meantime, and for the people of Mali, "It is not about the memory of the pain but rather the long lasting impression" as French and Malian forces move swiftly and oppressively in Mali, aiming to recapture lands such as Timbuktu. For those Malian people, they see the French as liberators, liberating them from “Al-Qaeda linked rebels" and Islamic rule of law. The liberators have outlined their mission in Mali and with support from the Malian Government, they aim to deploy forces and resources to stop the rebels, recapture the towns which the rebels have captured and finally, secure the Northern desert in order to prevent the rebels from returning.   

For the West, and especially the French,“Mali is a potential Afghanistan for France". However, to actualize this situation, what is becoming more apparent in our African continent and what we are failing to realize is that the West is coming back. It is not only the "New age of war" but it is history repeating itself and the re-colonization and post scramble of Africa. Their mission for Africa is resource and economic domination, and their cover story for Africa is to help failed states and ensure stability - all through the establishment of democratic regimes and laws. Their excuse is to prevent the spread of Islamism.  

They did it once before: first it was backward, uneducated heathen who became slaves and now it is Muslims linked to terrorism - an excuse they use to dominate and control. Call them rebels, call them Jihadist; but when fighting for your existence became an act of terrorism, ask yourself, do you really know what is going on?
 
 
- Sumayya is the MSA Union of South Africa Head of politics, South African and international affairs. She is currently studying at the university of Pretoria.Sumayya has written the piece on behalf of MSA Union.